SIC LATVIA

Click "Enter" to submit the form.

neural_header_banner

AI-assisted analytical prototypes

These experimental tools illustrate how AI-assisted analytical interfaces could support research and public understanding of complex topics. The prototypes combine discourse monitoring, thematic mapping, and evidence-based comparison to demonstrate how emerging technologies can help identify patterns in public discussion, highlight dominant narratives, and assess the relationship between scientific evidence and public visibility.

Discourse Radar

The SIC Discourse Radar is a prototype visual tool that shows which dimensions dominate public discussion around a selected theme. Instead of measuring tone only, it maps the relative intensity of narratives such as health, care, participation, technology, isolation, and trust. In a real implementation, this kind of tool could help identify which issues are most visible, under-discussed, or becoming more prominent across public discourse.

SIC Discourse Radar

Prototype tool for mapping which dimensions dominate discussion within a selected public topic.

live demo
Dominant dimension
Signal concentration
Analytical reading
Topic scope
Dimension intensities
Last update —

Sentiment Tracker

The Sentiment Tracker is a prototype interface for monitoring how selected public topics are discussed across digital environments. It is designed to simulate the type of signals that can be extracted from public discourse analysis, including positive, neutral, and negative sentiment, changes over time, source distribution, and shifts in dominant narrative patterns. In a full implementation, such a system could combine data from public comments, forums, social media, and media texts to detect emerging attitudes, communication risks, and differences between regions, platforms, or themes.

SIC Signal Panel

Prototype interface for AI-assisted monitoring of discourse tone, narrative direction and signal intensity.

live demo
Positive
0%
Neutral
0%
Negative
0%
Analysed sample
0
Directional shift
Dominant tone
Topic scope
Ageing
Dominant narrative
7-cycle signal pulse
Last update —

Longevity Index Dashboard

Longevity Index Dashboard is a prototype data visualisation tool developed by the Social Innovation Centre of Latvia that translates complex healthspan data into a clear, accessible public dashboard. It combines five dimensions — physical activity, nutrition, social connection, sleep quality, and environment — into a single composite score for Latvia.

Longevity Index — SIC Latvia
Prototype Tool · Healthspan Research

Longevity Index
Dashboard

Tracking composite healthspan across Latvia's regions — combining physical activity, nutrition, social connection, sleep, and environment into one civic score.

Latvia · Regional View Updated Q1 2026 5 Dimensions · 47 Indicators
📊
Overall Score
61/100
↑ +3.2 pts since 2023
🏃
Physical Activity
68/100
↑ Above EU avg
🥗
Nutrition
54/100
→ Stable
🤝
Social Connection
48/100
↓ Regional gap widens
😴
Sleep Quality
57/100
↑ +1.8 pts
Index Profile
Latvia · national composite · 2026
Physical Nutrition Sleep Social Environ. Activity
Latvia 2026
EU avg (est.)
Regional Map View
Colour = longevity index score · darker = higher
Riga 71 Pierīga 65 Vidzeme 58 Kurzeme 60 Zemgale 55 Latgale 46 Low High Index score
Index Trend · 2019 – 2026
National average vs. highest and lowest regions
80 65 50 35 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Riga region (highest)
National average
Latgale (lowest)
🏃
Physical Activity
Guideline adherence in 55–74 age group, active transport, sport participation.
68
Above avg
🥗
Nutrition Quality
Mediterranean pattern adherence, fruit & vegetable access, diet diversity.
54
Needs focus
🤝
Social Connection
Isolation rates, community participation, intergenerational contact frequency.
48
Priority gap
😴
Sleep Quality
Self-reported sleep sufficiency, sleep disorder prevalence, shift work exposure.
57
Needs focus
🌿
Environment
Green space access, air quality, walkability, age-friendly infrastructure.
72
Strong
💊
Clinical Access
Screening coverage, vitamin D correction rates, preventive care uptake.
59
Improving

This is a live prototype developed by the Social Innovation Centre of Latvia as part of our Healthy Ageing research programme. Data shown is illustrative and based on aggregated public health sources. We are testing approaches to making complex healthspan data legible and actionable for citizens, municipalities, and policymakers. Your feedback shapes what we build next.

Evidence vs Hype Matrix

The Evidence vs Hype Matrix is a prototype analytical widget that places selected interventions into a 2D matrix: (1) horizontal axis: strength of evidence; (2)vertical axis: level of public hype / visibility. This helps show where scientific support and public attention are aligned — and where marketing, visibility, or discussion significantly outpace evidence. In a real SIC system, this type of tool could support evidence-informed communication, public education, and intervention prioritisation.

SIC Evidence vs Hype Matrix

Prototype matrix for comparing public visibility with the strength of available evidence across selected interventions.

live demo
Highlighted item
Matrix reading
Evidence signal
Visibility signal
Analytical note
Interventions in view
Last update —
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site.